Name of Programme
MB ChB Medicine
Final Award
MB ChB
Location
51±¬ÁÏ / Crewe
Awarding Institution/Body
University Of 51±¬ÁÏ
Teaching Institution
University Of 51±¬ÁÏ
School of Study
School of UG Medicine
Programme Code(s)
UMBF4SME / Full Time / 4.5 Years / 51±¬ÁÏ
UMBF4SMEC / Full Time / 4.5 Years / Crewe
UMBF4SMEIM / Full Time / 4.5 Years / 51±¬ÁÏ
Professional Body Accreditation
The programme is subject to quality assurance by the General Medical Council (GMC).
Relevant Subject Benchmark Statement (SBS)
Medicine 2002
Admission Criteria
A-level (or equivalent): ABB (including Chemistry or Biology),
or BSc 2.1 or above in a subject cognate to medicine.
IELTS 7.0 with a minimum of 6.5 in each component.
Offers are subject to exceeding a minimum standard set in a multiple mini interview selection process.

Applicable Cohort(s)
From January 2026
FHEQ Level
7
UCAS Code
71A8
Summary of Programme
The MBChB programme at 51±¬ÁÏ is an integrated, systems-based curriculum. The first term covers key topics in biomedical science, with knowledge and understanding being progressively contextualised with the introduction of systems units from Term 2 (starting with the musculoskeletal system). There is a strong social medicine thread with units covering topics related to epidemiology, health psychology and health policy. A strong clinical education stream runs through Phase I, with students gaining meaningful clinical experience from the first term. The integrative unit at the end of Phase is designed to ensure that students are prepared for the transition to full-time clinical training. Phase II is delivered in a clinical environment, with students rotating through a series of blocks aligned with the configuration of healthcare delivery in primary and secondary environments.
Student selected components in Phase 1 and 2 allow students to pursue an area of particular interest in more depth, while Narrative Medicine affords an opportunity for students to gain insight to an individual perspective on living with a chronic illness. Professional development is supported by the completion of a portfolio of evidence throughout the course and specific blocks of time in Phase 1 and Phase 2.
Educational Aims of the Programme
The broad aim of the 51±¬ÁÏ MBChB programme is that new graduates should have the clinical competence to work as Foundation Doctors, combined with the potential to develop along the continuum of medical education into humane and rational doctors. In accordance with the GMC document ‘Good Medical Practice’, graduates will make the care of patients their first concern, applying their knowledge and skills in a competent and ethical manner and using their ability to provide leadership and to analyse complex and uncertain situations.
Programme Outcomes

Knowledge and Understanding

Outcomes 1 – Professional values and behaviours
Outcomes 2 – Professional skills
Outcomes 3 – Professional knowledge





Teaching/Learning Strategy

1. Lectures
2. Group working activities, as described in the relevant unit work books
3. Clinical work, supported by workbook tasks (for example, MiniCEXs [mini clinical evaluation exercises] and case–based discussions [CBDs] in Phase 2)
4. Structured self-directed learning tasks
5. Self-tests and other resources available via Moodle

Assessment Strategy

The MB ChB is an integrated curriculum, thus individual assessments do not test specific GMC OFGs. More detailed mapping is provided in the appendix below.

1. Written end of term assessments (ETAs) in Phase 1
2. Observed structured clinical exams (OSCEs) in both Phase 1 and Phase 2
3. Narrative medicine assessment/CBDs in Phase 1
4. Reports, posters and structured interviews in Phase 1 student selected components (SSCs)
5. Written Intermediate and Final professional examinations in Phase 2.
6. Satisfactory completion of an ePortfolio
Programme Outcomes

Cognitive Skills

Teaching/Learning Strategy

Assessment Strategy

Programme Outcomes

Practical/Transferable Skills

Outcomes 1 – Professional values and behaviours
Outcomes 2 – Professional skills
Outcomes 3 – Professional knowledge

Teaching/Learning Strategy

Explain the teaching and learning methods and strategies used to help students achieve each part of the practical/transferable skills

1. Lectures
2. Group working activities, as described in the relevant unit work books
3. Clinical work, supported by workbook tasks (for example, MiniCEXs [mini clinical
evaluation exercises] and case–based discussions [CBDs] in Phase 2)
4. Structured self-directed learning tasks
5. Self-tests and other resources available via Moodle

Assessment Strategy

The MB ChB is an integrated curriculum, thus individual
assessments do not test specific GMC OFGs. More
detailed mapping is provided in the appendix below.
1. Written end of term assessments (ETAs) in Phase 1
2. Observed structured clinical exams (OSCEs) in both Phase 1 and Phase 2
3. Narrative medicine assessment/CBDs in Phase 1
4. Reports, posters and structured interviews in Phase 1 student selected components (SSCs)
5. Written Intermediate and Final professional examinations in Phase 2.
6. Satisfactory completion of an ePortfolio
External Reference Points
• Promoting excellence: standards for medical education and training (GMC 2016) [Promoting excellence - GMC - ]

• Good medical practice (GMC 2024) [Good medical practice 2024 - GMC - ]

Outcomes for graduates (2024) [Structure and overarching outcome - GMC - ]

• Framework for Higher Education Qualifications []

• Relevant Subject Benchmark Statement(s) []

Please note: This specification provides a concise summary of the main features of the programme and the learning outcomes that a typical student might reasonably be expected to achieve and demonstrate if he/she takes full advantage of the learning opportunities that are provided. More detailed information on the learning outcomes, content and teaching, learning and assessment methods of each course unit/module can be found in the departmental or programme handbook. The accuracy of the information contained in this document is reviewed annually by the 51±¬ÁÏ and may be checked by the Quality Assurance Agency.
Date of Production
March 2017 revised April 2018, November 2025
Date approved by School Learning and Teaching Committee
March 2017, revised April 2018, November 2025
Date approved by School Board of Study
March 2017, revised April 2018, November 2025
Date approved by University Learning and Teaching Committee
March 2017, revised April 2018, November 2025
Date of Annual Review
In line with the University's annual monitoring review process

 

PROGRAMME STRUCTURES